Who Is Doing What
- parkinglottery
- Jul 31, 2024
- 4 min read
Updated: Oct 28, 2024
Preamble
This blog is about work. How and where we work, and why the discussion generated by these questions is relevant to the future of work. The world of work is evolving. This blog will provide some history and context, highlight the push and pull between employees and employers, and sample some Return To Office (RTO) policy considerations. It’s important enough to repeat: The world of work is evolving. Correspondingly, this blog will try to keep pace.
Who Is Doing What
The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on how, and where, many people work. Prior to the pandemic, the vast majority of workers spent 5 days in the office every week. The shutdowns in response to the pandemic forced employees to work from home, or not at all, for an extended period of time. Different companies and different industries reopened their offices at various points after the shutdown was enacted. Many have tweaked their policies as a result of feedback or pushback. Here are a few factors that impact the availability of work flexibility.
Flexibility by Industry
Even within industries that require a high degree of physical presence, some roles can be performed remotely. As a result, while fully in-office is the most logical choice for some industries, no industry has a 100% fully in-office rate in aggregate. At the other end of the spectrum, there are certainly some industries where the vast majority of work can be done remotely. Companies in these industries skew much higher in offering their employees work flexibility.
Table 1 lists the industries with the highest percent of
companies requiring employees to be fully in-office.
Industry | % of companies fully in-office |
Restaurant and Food Service | 65% |
Education | 51% |
Hospitality | 48% |
Retail and Apparel | 40% |
Manufacturing and Logistics | 40% |
As expected, the industries with the highest percent of companies requiring employees to be fully in-office all require a high degree of physical presence - wait staff, teachers, and store employees must be physically present in order for their respective companies to do business.
Table 2 lists the industries with the highest percent
of companies offering work flexibility.
Industry | % of companies offering flexibility |
Technology | 97% |
Insurance | 93% |
Media and Entertainment | 93% |
Telecommunications | 89% |
Financial Services | 88% |
The industries with the highest percent of companies offering their employees work flexibility were already established as the companies with the most geographically distributed workforces prior to the pandemic. If a technology team made up of employees across New York, Dublin, and Mumbai offices could work effectively six years ago, it stands to reason that those same employees may be just as effective - or even more effective with the introduction of newer technologies - working remotely instead of in their respective offices.
Flexibility by Geography
Table 3 lists the states with the highest percent of
companies requiring employees to be fully in-office
State | % of companies fully in-office |
Mississippi | 41% |
West Virginia | 29% |
Arkansas | 28% |
Kansas | 28% |
New Mexico | 27% |
Table 4 lists the states with the highest percent of
companies offering their employees work flexibility
State | % of companies offering flexibility |
Massachusetts | 91% |
Washington | 90% |
Colorado | 89% |
California | 89% |
Oregon | 88% |
The industries that make up the economy of a state is often a good predictor of the level of flexibility in that state. All of the states in table 3 share Food Services and Manufacturing as two of the main industries, both of which require employees to be physically present. All of the states in table 4 share Technology as one of the main industries, an industry where distributed teams had existed prior to the pandemic.
This phenomenon trickles up to the regional level as well. Many states in the South and the Midwest have companies in the Food Services and Manufacturing industries, while the Northeast and West have a higher percentage of their companies in the Financial Services and Technology industries. So the data in Table 5 should come as no surprise.
Table 5 lists out the regional breakdown of work flexibility
Offering Flexibility | |||
Region | Fully remote | Hybrid | Fully in-office |
South | 34% | 44% | 22% |
Midwest | 36% | 45% | 19% |
Northeast | 39% | 46% | 15% |
West | 44% | 39% | 17% |
Flexibility by Company Size
Table 6 lists out the breakdown of work flexibility by company size
Offering Flexibility | |||
Company Size | Fully remote | Hybrid | Fully in-office |
Small (< 500 employees) | 73% | 15% | 12% |
Medium (500 - 5,000 employees) | 34% | 37% | 29% |
Large (5,000 - 25,000 employees) | 23% | 53% | 24% |
Mega (> 25,000 employees) | 15% | 67% | 18% |
This table presents three main insights
There appears to be a trend towards the hybrid approach and away from either extreme for companies with more than 500 employees - Hybrid is the biggest percentage of all size classifications except the smallest companies.
The size of a company appears to be directly correlated to the likelihood of that company offering a hybrid approach. With each increasing size classification, the fully remote percentage drops by 7-11 points, the fully in-office percentage drops by 5-6 points, and the hybrid percentage correspondingly increases by 14-16 points.
Small companies are the outlier to the above two trends. One possible explanation is the “No choice fully remote” variant presented in the July 2024 blog post. This is a variant of the fully remote work model where the company has no physical office, therefore all employees must work remotely. Startups, in particular, may be taking advantage of a fully remote workforce to eschew a physical presence altogether, allocating their precious capital on other areas of their business instead.
The Bottom Line
Industry and company size appear to be important factors that companies use when adopting a work location policy. Geography matters, but only as an indirect correlation to the industry in the geography. Aside from the smallest companies - those with fewer than 500 employees - the bigger the company, the more likely they will offer a hybrid work arrangement.
Up Next
Citations
Flex Index (flex.scoopforwork.com), Q2 2024 Flex Report
Our Shameless Pitch
Regardless of which work policy your company chooses to implement, The Parking Lottery can help make your employees’ in-office experience more palatable and less frustrating. A more fulfilling in-office experience leads to higher employee retention. It’s also a perk that serves as a differentiator to attract new talent. Contact us for more information.